APLawrence - Information and Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed
RSS Feeds Get APLawrence.com by RSS











(OLDER) <- More Stuff -> (NEWER) (NEWEST)
Home > News Posts > Microsoft Windows standards ––>Re: Is it possible
Printer Friendly Version




News Group Posts

Microsoft Windows standards




From: "Peter F. Dubuque" <peterd@shell3.primushost.com>
Subject: Re: Is it possible
References: <95uisj$vh0$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
<LgCi6.48$bV1.2385@nnrp1.sbc.net>
<9qq3c5AO8ok6Ew0p@prestwich-smile-gemach.freeserve.co.uk>
<3A92DFAE.FEE4B3BD@aplawrence.com>
<Q+m2FQBoW5k6Ewgg@prestwich-smile-gemach.freeserve.co.uk>
<3A93B056.DAED16C@aplawrence.com>
<fIbVY$Cfi$k6EwDO@prestwich-smile-gemach.freeserve.co.uk>
<3A9455E2.D59204@aplawrence.com>
<_L%k6.133201$Z2.1768384@nnrp1.uunet.ca>
<wMBl6.6183$JG.794100@news.shore.net>
<m6Ol6.133736$Z2.1785370@nnrp1.uunet.ca> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 23:24:12 GMT In comp.lang.basic.visual.misc Ian R <ianr@notquitesure.net> wrote: > That is complete and utter crap. There's obviously no point in continuing > this. > Peter F. Dubuque <peterd@shell3.primushost.com> wrote in message > news:wMBl6.6183$JG.794100@news.shore.net... >> In comp.lang.basic.visual.misc Ian R <ianr@notquitesure.net> wrote: >> >> > And exactly what protocols and standards have they screwed up ? >> >> HTML exports in Office. >> CSS1. >> Java. >> Kerberos. >> >> Just to mention a few.













Here are my assertions, elaborated upon.

- Office exports an unmaintainable melange of HTML, XML, VML, and CSS.  The
severity of this varies depending on the product.  Word, for example, 
merely exports grotesque code that works in some form in other 
browsers.  PowerPoint HTML exports are usually unviewable in any browser
other than IE.

- Except for IE5.5 for the Macintosh, no Microsoft browser is fully
compliant with CSS level 1.  Three non-compliant Windows versions (4.0,
5.0, and 5.5) have been released since it was adopted as a standard over
four years ago.

- Microsoft developed a proprietary version of Java intended to lock
developers into the Windows platform.  They labeled it as JAVA COMPATIBLE
even though it failed Sun's compatibility tests.  

- Microsoft's implementation of Kerberos contains proprietary extensions
that make it incompatible with other implementations.  They released
details of their extensions on their website with a click-through EULA that
allows the use of the information "for the sole purpose of reviewing the
Specification for security analysis" and explicitly withholding the right
to use the information to implement a version of Kerberos compatible with
the specification.  



There are plenty of other possible complaints.  I'm omitting 
- obvious bugs
- modification of Microsoft's proprietary standards to either lock people
  into their products or force upgrades (e.g. perpetually changing Office
  file formats)
- attempts to introduce competing proprietary standards when perfectly
  acceptable open standards already exist (e.g. DirectX vs. OpenGL)


Rebut these complaints, if you wish, or don't--I don't care.  But don't
dismiss them as "complete and utter crap" unless you have facts to back
up your dismissal.


If this page was useful to you, please click to help others find it:  

Your +1's can help friends, contacts, and others on the web find the best stuff when they search.

Comments?



Click here to add your comments



Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email

Click here to add your comments


If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar



Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here

Jump to Comments



Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.

Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.

We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.

g_face.jpg

This post tagged:

       - Microsoft




Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Guest Post Here