Newsgroups: comp.unix.sco.misc From: bill@wjv.com.REMOVEME (Bill Vermillion) Subject: Re: Problem running 2 Adaptec 3950U2 with SCO 5.0.5 Message-ID: <FIroFC.1xD3@wjv.com.REMOVEME> References: <37EFD39C.26639F0A@bytedesigns.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 11:11:36 GMT In article <37EFD39C.26639F0A@bytedesigns.com>, Heinz Wittenbecher (at Pioneer) <heinz@bytedesigns.com> wrote: >I'm trying to run 2 controllers so that I don't bring the first's >Channel B down to narrow scsi speed (tape and cdrom) for the second >HD.
You are making assumptions of how SCSI works - perpetated by articles in the popular PC press and even in documentation in at least on well known certification manual. The bus slows down to the speed of the slowest device ONLY when that device is communicating with another device on the same bus. There can only be two devices on the bus at one time. The devices negotiate their highest common speed. For example, if you had a SCSI I then the highest bus-speed would be 5MB/sec (and so many of the earlier devices couldn't even touch that rate in data transfer). Connect that to one of the newest Ultra drives with a 40MB/sec bus speed. The data transfer will occur at the 5MB/sec speed. When the slow device is finished, then perhaps another 40MB device will want to exchange data with the one from above. At this point bus is running at 40MB.
IOW - the bus does not slow down to the slowest device on the bus EXCEPT when that device is one of two devices communicating. The bus speed changes depending on device connection. If you put your slow device on another controller and want to send data to the controller with the slower device, then you are still limited by the slower device as to the rate of speed of the data transfer - effectively slowing the output - not the bus speed - of the device on the first controller. In smaller systems you should not see any performance difference. You increase the cost with no performance gain. In larger systems if you have many slower devices you could put in a controller for the lower speed devices and reserve the ultra style controller for several HD's. For small systems, two or three HD's, that's overkill IMO. -- Bill Vermillion bv @ wjv.com
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar