From: Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> Subject: Re: Netgear print server Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 08:07:18 -0700 References: <pSzK8.32$ir.47310@news.onenet.net>
<shh1guot6e7r5thpkg52j8ttnrlrv6pr54@4ax.com>
<rg5M8.33$ir.51703@news.onenet.net>
<3d097bf8.71609290@news.highway1.com.au>
<3D09CEAA.9030400@aplawrence.com>
<3D0A9290.5000600@steinmetznet.com> On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 23:04:17 GMT, Robert Steinmetz <rob@steinmetznet.com> wrote: >> True. But.. netcat works better. >> /SCOFAQ/scotec7.html#getnetcat > >I have used LPR on many systems, without problems. Why is netcat better? >I have seen many posts advocating it use, but no simple explanation of why.
Methinks you have to roll back the clock about 4-5 years, when OSR5 LPR/LPD was seriously buggy. The most common problems that I saw were hangs when printing a large number of small jobs, and high cpu utilization. I've experienced both with LPR/LPD. The alternative, HPNP for HP print servers, was worse. It had locking problems, would leave garbage all over /tmp, would hang if you print to an off-line printer, and belch bogus error messages if SNMP status were not available from the print server. I also had some difficult to reproduce problems that resulted in continuous retries with a corresponding deluge in network traffic. In 3.2v5.0.5, there were also some "scoadmin" printer configuration problems that made printers disappear if added after an LPR/LPD configured printer. lpstat -t would sometimes fail to show all printers and often stall for extended periods waiting for a configured, but powered off LPR/LPD printer, to come online. AFAIK, the LPR/LPD, scoadmin, and lpstat problems were solved in some update to 3.2v5.0.5 and remain fixed in 3.2v5.0.6. However, 4-5 years ago, there was no suitable solution to the reliable printing problem. I was looking for something that preserved the print spooler system and the print spooler scripts, but communicated directly with the print server. Kevin Smith supplied the answer with his "netcat" program. I'm not much of a programmist, so additional help was needed to modify the scripts to use netcat and to add the /etc/printers configuration file. I have a customer that was printing about 2000 checks per day. The program creates on print job per check resulting in a huge number of print jobs that had to work perfectly. We started with LPR/LPD, but that kept hanging. We switched to HPNP, but ran into a wide assortment of stupid problems (inability to recover from an off-line condition, print server bugs, trash in /tmp, job counter errors, etc). The system would also bog down somewhat when printing. When I setup netcat, the hangs stopped, off-line recovery functioned, the print server bugs were not an issue, and nobody even notices when it was printing. We also noticed an unexpected printing speed improvement as there is apparently some overhead to setting up a print job using LPR/LPD and HPNP in the print server.
Try it. You'll probably like it. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060 (831)421-6491 pgr (831)426-1240 fax (831)336-2558 home http://www.LearnByDestroying.com WB6SSY jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us jeffl@cruzio.com
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar