APLawrence - Information and Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed
RSS Feeds Get APLawrence.com by RSS











(OLDER) <- More Stuff -> (NEWER) (NEWEST)
Home > News Posts > using removable hard drive for backup
Printer Friendly Version




News Group Posts

using removable hard drive for

backup



From: Anthony Lawrence <tony@pcunix.com>
Subject: Re: sco-list: Re: DVD-RAM
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 13:24:50 -0500
References: <3e05e9aa$0$1396$2c3e98f8@news.voyager.net>
<H7JHMo.ypn@wjv.com>
<au7100$1kl$1@pcls4.std.com>
<20021223095319.B13584@barryg.mi.celestial.com> Bill Campbell wrote: > On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 07:53:19AM -0500, Anthony Lawrence wrote: > ... > >>The advantage of dvd-ram is price and longevity. IDE DVD-RAMS are >>getting very inexpensive and even the top of the line (with capability >>to write CD's in addition to DVD-R* ) are under $400.00. Low end units >>are under $200.00. DVD-RAM media can be over-written for years and >>years - they say 100,000 writes and a 30 year media life. That's >>"forever" for most of us. > > > BackupEdge works very well with DVD-RAM. Their FFR (Fast File Restore) > feature is virtual IFR (Instantaneous File Restore). There are limitations > of course in that everything has to fit in 4.7gb, but with Edge, that may > be extended by file-by-file compression. > > >>At the present time, if you have more data than you can compress to 4.7 >>GB (in the field I see that as typically around 9 GB), tape is obviously >>the way to go. Another reason you might need tape is speed: DVD-RAM >>isn't blindingly fast on writing - say about 3GB an hour for the units >>I've used. Otherwise, I wouldn't use tape - this is cheaper, and far >>more reliable. > > > We're looking seriously at getting away from tape and DVD style backups > entirely, and using removable hard drives in their place. We're > prototyping a system here which has a Mandrake 8.2 Linux box with external > ieee1394 (FireWire) 120GB hard drives (sorry SCO/Caldera 3.1.1 Workstation > doesn't support ieee1394 reliably and I haven't received my UnitedLinux 4.0 > yet :-). The external chassis and drive were about $200.00 at CompUSA, and > I have a similar LaCie 120GB on my PowerMac G4 that I paid $350.00 for > about six months ago. The problem with that is that you don't get deep backup - you can't go back a week, a month, a year. I think it's great if it is combined with archival backup that can be taken off-site. It's completely unacceptable by itself.












Unfortunately, I am seeing this sort of thing promoted more and more. 
As I said, it's great as long as there is also tape or dvd-ram in the 
picture.  Without that, somebody somewhere someday is going to be very 
sad that they made this choice.  I wouldn't do that for my own data and 
strongly discourage anyone from it.

I recommend to my customers that they keep at least a full week worth of 
tapes/cartridges and rotate one out monthly, keeping at least two months 
back (and more is always better).  I can't tell you how many times being 
able to pull up a month old file has saved the day.



-- 
Tony Lawrence
Free  Linux Skills Test: http://aplawrence.com/skillstest.html





If this page was useful to you, please click to help others find it:  

Your +1's can help friends, contacts, and others on the web find the best stuff when they search.

Comments?



Click here to add your comments



Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email

Click here to add your comments


If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar



Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here

Jump to Comments



Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.

Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.

We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.

g_face.jpg

This post tagged:

       - SCO_OSR5




Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Guest Post Here