osr5 sar mpsar cpusar scosar
From: Bela Lubkin <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: sar & mpsar Date: 24 Jul 2005 07:52:42 -0400 Message-ID: <email@example.com> References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Brandt Eppler wrote: > On a multi processor system is there a difference between > > Sar 5 5 and mpsar 5 5 ? > > Which is the best one to run for a SMP machine? They are effectively equivalent for most purposes. `mpsar` supports a few added flags, but if you aren't using those, its output is identical. Also, `mpsar -A` includes the output of those added flags. `mpsar` was initially a separate binary, added when you installed SCO MPX (SMP) on top of the corresponding release of SCO Unix. It was separate at that time because it was a special MPX add-on, built from different sources than the standard `sar`. The sources weren't merged until later. Now both are built from one set of sources, but since the documentation and behavior were already set, the `mpsar` name hasn't been removed. The differences should probably have been smoothed over by making `sar` recognize the few added `mpsar` options when running on an SMP kernel; but that hasn't been done. Any OSR5 `sar` binary will act differently when invoked under any of 4 names: sar, mpsar, cpusar, scosar. (`scosar` isn't documented and no link to that name is shipped. It adds tracking of a few obscure filesystem behaviors; and some flags to get different sorts of delta outputs. It's undocumented for fairly good reasons -- the flags don't work very well.) `cpusar` offers per-CPU tracking of some behaviors. It's a lot more different than `mpsar` (but still the same binary, these days). >Bela<
Got something to add? Send me email.
(OLDER) <- More Stuff -> (NEWER) (NEWEST)
Printer Friendly Version
Increase ad revenue 50-250% with Ezoic