The attitude I hear most often is that the cost of the OS (with or without support) doesn't pop out of the P&L ; it's buried in the noise. Heck, for most folks, *I* cost a whole lot more than the OS ever will, and that raises another point: my experience used to be that for the average business which depends on outside support, Linux was going to cost more because it had more minor snafu's and glitches. That opinion has changed more recently: Linux has become more mature, but free still isn't the overall reason.
I really don't think it's cost that is hurting SCO (though it wouldn't hurt to offer something in the few hundred dollar range). Rather it's features- and I think it's very obvious that the needs of the real Small Buiness Market are very different from the market that Unixware addresses. Certainly some people fall in between: I have a number of customers in that grey area, and they'll probably opt for Unixware. But the smaller folks probably won't, and I don't think SCO is really aware of how much that's going to hurt them, both long and short term.
If I were younger, and still had some working brain cells left, I think I'd essay to produce a Linux_SCO; that is, a Linux port that offered SCO-like administration tools, and with as much binary compatibility as I could squeeze into it. I'll bet you could easily get several hundred dollars for it, and yes, the GPL lets someone else profit from your labors, but if you paid attention to what the peanuts really want and kept giving it to them, you could carve out a healthy living. Too bad I'm so old and tired. Gee, I bet there's some hungry young SCO engineer reading this right now- getting any ideas, are you? :-)
That's not to say that SCO is necessarily doing the wrong thing for SCO, for its employees, for its stockholders. Maybe hunting woolly mammoths is the best thing to do given the tools they have and the number of mouths they have to feed. After all, woolly mammoths are easy to spot, a little dumb :-), and when you drive one off a cliff everyone feasts for a looong time.
But my feeling is that there are going to be less and less woolly mammoths because the ubiquitous and inexpensive computers and the ever-growing communication capabilities let itsy bitsy mice do incredible things. Very few people in my father's generation were independent: they worked for someone or had groups of people working for them. Today, I have quite a few friends who are just like me: one person entities working all by themselves. Computers and communications freed them from slavery, and I think we're just starting to see that wave roll in. Of course, small partnerships enjoy the same fruits, and amazingly small companies can do incredibly big things nowadays. I'd guess the big companies will survive, but I really think I'd rather go after the little market. That's just me, though, and it doesn't mean SCO is wrong.
So, 10 years from now, maybe both SCO and A.P. Lawrence will be around. Or maybe not :-)
Well, it is almost 12 years later and SCO is on its last legs. I'm still here, though fast approaching retirement.
More Articles by Tony Lawrence
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Wed Sep 2 11:20:42 2009: TonyLawrence
It is 10 years later now and SCO is just about gone.
I'm still here, and Linux is all grown up and stable.
Wed Sep 2 13:11:10 2009: anonymous
Linux back then was like a microcomputer kit of the mid-1970s: it worked but there were lots of screws to tighten and numerous solder joints to be made. I would not have considered Linux back then as a viable business OS, anymore than I would have suggested a company run their operation on a KIM-1. Times sure have changed!
Wed Sep 2 13:33:19 2009: TonyLawrence
Good analogy.
Thu Sep 3 13:40:10 2009: BigDumbDinosaur
http://bcstechnology.net
Thanks! I forgot to fill in the blanks before posting the message. <Grin>
Thu Nov 5 15:19:46 2009: anonymous
please give complete information about the price and ram of unix and lunix or also DOS, window xp
Thu Nov 5 16:13:27 2009: BigDumbDinosaur
http://bcstechnology.net
please give complete information about the price and ram of unix and lunix or also DOS, window xp
That request makes almost as much sense as a politician trying to explain why he got caught in bed with the hired help. <Grin>
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar