I couldn't find the Belden article Jeff referenced below, but they do have a general Cable intallation guide page that mostly provides links to PDF's and videos that show how to use their cable tools.
From: jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us (Jeff Liebermann) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sco.misc Subject: Re: Hubs Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 18:24:58 GMT Message-ID: <37a245ec.9745365@news.ricochet.net> References: <01bed2cc$1ed21b80$0101a8c0@transova>
<7n7dbt$eg5$1@m2.c2.telstra-mm.net.au>
<MPG.1202f3f162f0b3a89897b0@news.earthlink.net>
<37996feb.10532283@cnews.newsguy.com>
<slrn7pprs8.9bj.sarnold@redwood.willamette.edu> On Mon, 26 Jul 1999 23:36:16 GMT, sarnold@redwood.willamette.edu (Seth R Arnold) wrote: >I have also heard that the electrons travel along the outside of the wire; >stranded wire has more surface area than solid wire, therefore (the thinking >goes :) less resistance.
Think impedance instead of resistance. When you're working with 100-250MHz carrier rates and 50Mhz symbol rates, you're playing with RF not DC resistance. Any difference in DC resistance of stranded vs solid over the maximum 100meter segment length is negligible when compared to the 100ohms impedance of the twisted pair. Geometry will tell you that stranded wire has a greater surface area and therefore less loss at RF frequencies. However, life is not so simple above 50Mhz or so. Bends in the wire, irregularities, proximity to metallic objects, and variations in twist rate, will all contribute to losses and reflections far in exess of any differences caused by a surface (skin effect) losses. Stranded wire tends to be worse in most of the aformentioned. It bends easier, therefore edge reflections are worse. It's more irregular, therefore dispersion is worse. Because it's more flexible, the twist rate tends to move around. However, all the above are very minor compared to losses from crappy cable assembly techniques and the disgusting RF characteristics of the common RJ-45 connector. If I had to put a number on the contribution of the differences between solid and stranded CAT5, I would say that it the surface area contributed to perhaps 1/1,000 of the total loss picture. Belden has a nice article with mangled formatting on the topic. Note how the impedance varies radically along the cable length, and is only close to 100ohms in the graphs. This is the real difference between CAT5 and the newer cables that are rated to much higher frequencies. The newer cables have much less manufacturing and therefore impedance changes.http://www.belden.com/products/ftvimptp.htm(link dead, sorry) The impedance becomes critical only in 1000baseT. 1000baseT uses hybrids to seperate the direction of data flow on each pair of wires. Each end has 4ea hybrids for each of the pairs running at 125Mhz symbol rate. The directivity (how well it seperates data going in opposite directions) of these hybrids is heavily dependent upon the termination impedance which is primarily determined by the cable impedance. If the cable impedance is all over the graph, or if variations in impedance along its length cause waveform distortion, 1000baseT is going to have problems.
-- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060 (831)421-6491 pgr (831)426-1240 fax (831)336-2558 home http://www.cruzio.com/~jeffl WB6SSY jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us jeffl@cruzio.com
More Articles by Tony Lawrence - Find me on Google+
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar